Home
Buy & Subscribe
Special Features
Products & Services
Online Store
Products by category
Products by publisher
Product lines
News Channels
Biotechnology
Therapeutic Areas
Business
RSS Feeds
Free RSS News
Get the latest news direct
to your desktop
feed image

Search in our News Channels

 

Search in our Online Store

Copaxone(R) Significantly Reduced Annual Relapse Rates And Stabilized Disease Progression In Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients Failing Interferon Treatment Print E-mail
10 Apr 2008

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. today announced results from a three-year study evaluating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who failed first-line monotherapy and switched treatments

Jerusalem, Israel | April 10, 2008 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (NASDAQ: TEVA) today announced results from a three-year study evaluating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who failed first-line monotherapy and switched treatments. The results demonstrated that patients who switched from interferon β (IFNβ) to COPAXONE(R) (glatiramer acetate injection) experienced a 77 percent reduction in annualized relapse rates (0.63 to 0.14). In addition, these patients did not progress significantly in their disability as measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The results of this study, entitled "Therapeutic outcome 3 years after switching of immunomodulatory therapies in patients with RRMS in Argentina," were published in the April issue of the European Journal of Neurology.

The study evaluated the clinical efficacy of switching patients who responded inadequately to first-line immunomodulatory therapy. All patients who switched among the immunomodulatory treatments benefited in terms of relapse rate reduction, however, those who switched from IFNβ to COPAXONE(R) experienced no significant disability progression, while patient disability continued to increase in patients who switched from COPAXONE(R) to IFNβ or from one IFNβ to another IFNβ. These observations may be due to the emergence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in patients taking IFNβ. In addition, proportion of patients who did not experience a relapse over the entire 3-year treatment period, increased from 16% to 68% following switch to COPAXONE(R). Whereas the proportion of relapse-free patients switching from one IFNβ to another IFNβ remained similar before and after switch.

"RRMS patients who respond inadequately to first-line immunomodulatory therapy, generally benefit from switching to another class of immunomodulatory therapy", said Adriana Carrá, M.D., Department of Neurology, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, principal investigator. "For patients switching from IFNβ to Glatiramer Acetate, the results obtained are consistent with those of previous studies demonstrating a robust reduction in mean annualised relapse rate and a stabilisation of disease progression".

About the Study

The prospective observational study included 114 RRMS patients and was conducted at eight multiple sclerosis (MS) centers in Argentina. The study evaluated the clinical efficacy of switching patients who responded inadequately to first-line immunomodulatory therapy, as measured by annualized relapse rates, as well as the mean change in EDSS over a six-year period. The study included a three-year initial treatment phase (Before Switch period) and a three-year After Switch treatment phase.

Patients included in the study were drawn from a large patient registry in Argentina of over 1,500 patients. Treatment was initiated with one of four immunomodulatory therapies: IFNβ-1a i.m., IFNβ-1a s.c. (22 or 44 �g), IFNB-1b or COPAXONE(R). Clinical outcome was assessed after 3 years of treatment. Patients fulfilling criteria for treatment failure, defined as inadequate efficacy or the occurrence of adverse events, switched treatments either from low-dose to high-dose IFNβ (n=31), from IFNβ to COPAXONE(R) (n=47) or mitoxantrone (n=13), or from COPAXONE(R) to IFNβ (n=16) and followed for an additional three years. The choice for subsequent treatment was made by the neurologist after discussion with the patient.

In the group of patients who switched from IFNβ to COPAXONE(R) the annual relapse rate was reduced by 0.63 to 0.14, a decrease of 77 percent (p<0.0001). In those who switched to mitoxantrone, the annualized decreased rate was reduced by 71 percent (0.53 to 0.15) ( p=0.64). In contrast, the decrease in annualized relapse rates in patients switching between different IFNβ preparations was modest, declining from 0.37 to 0.16 (57 percent),(p=0.03).

For all patients switching because of inadequate efficacy, the EDSS score increased significantly over the original treatment period prior to the switch. Following the switch, EDSS scores continued to increase in patients switching from one IFNβ to another (P= 0.028) or from COPAXONE(R) to an IFNβ (P=0.0059). In contrast, in patients who switched from IFNβ to either COPAXONE(R) or mitoxantrone, no significant progression was observed during the switch. Least improved scores were observed in patients switching between IFNβ treatments.

In patients switching because of adverse events, no significant change in EDSS scores was observed during the initial period of treatment with either IFNβ or COPAXONE(R). EDSS scores remained stable following a switch from IFNβ to COPAXONE(R) and from COPAXONE to IFNβ.

About Multiple Sclerosis

MS is the leading cause of neurological disability in young adults. It is estimated that 400,000 people in the United States are affected by this disease, and that over two million people are affected worldwide. MS is a progressive, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system affecting the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves.

Patients with MS may experience physical symptoms and/or cognitive impairments, including weakness, fatigue, ataxia, physical dysfunction, bladder and bowel problems, sensory effects, and visual impairment. MS also has a significant impact on the sufferers' social functioning and overall quality of life.

About COPAXONE(R)

COPAXONE(R) is indicated for the reduction of the frequency of relapses in RRMS. The most common side effects of COPAXONE(R) are redness, pain, swelling, itching, a lump or an indentation at the site of injection, weakness, infection, pain, nausea, joint pain, anxiety, and muscle stiffness.

COPAXONE(R) is now approved in 51 countries worldwide, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Israel, and all European countries. In North America, COPAXONE(R) is marketed by Teva Neuroscience, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (NASDAQ:TEVA). In Europe, COPAXONE(R) is marketed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and sanofi-aventis. COPAXONE(R) is a registered trademark of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., headquartered in Israel, is among the top 20 pharmaceutical companies in the world and is the leading generic pharmaceutical company. The company develops, manufactures and markets generic and innovative human pharmaceuticals and active pharmaceutical ingredients, as well as animal health pharmaceutical products. Close to 90 percent of Teva's sales are in North America and Europe. Teva's innovative R&D focuses on developing novel drugs for diseases of the central nervous system.

See additional important information at http://www.copaxone.com/pi/index.html or call 1-800-887-8100 for electronic releases. For hardcopy releases, please see enclosed full prescribing information.

About Teva

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (NASDAQ: TEVA), headquartered in Israel, is among the top 20 pharmaceutical companies in the world and is the leading generic pharmaceutical company. The company develops, manufactures and markets generic and innovative human pharmaceuticals and active pharmaceutical ingredients, as well as animal health pharmaceutical products. Close to 90 percent of Teva's sales are in North America and Europe. Teva's innovative R&D focuses on developing novel drugs for diseases of the central nervous system.

SOURCE: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.





Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Wists!Simpy!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Blogmarks!Yahoo!Smarking!Netvouz!Shadows!RawSugar!Ma.gnolia!PlugIM!Squidoo!BlogMemes!FeedMeLinks!BlinkBits!Tailrank!linkaGoGo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
 

PipelineReview.com is powered by La Merie Business Intelligence La Merie Business Intelligence

For immediate assistance, please call us during business hours: Mon-Fri 09:00am - 18:30pm; GMT+01

La Merie S.L | Passatge Jordi Ferran, 20 | E-08028 Barcelona | T +34 93 342 91 97 | F +34 93 342 91 98 | Email info@lamerie.com | Internet www.lamerie.com
All contents © by La Merie S. L

Competitor Analysis Series

Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors

Order Now

Brief Report Series

CD40 and CD40L (CD154) Agonists & Antagonists

Order Now

Subscribe La Merie Biologics